5 March 2025

Albury MP rejects claims new abortion bill will lead to closure of all Catholic hospitals

| Oliver Jacques
Join the conversation
4
woman smiling with paper

Dr Amanda Cohn introduced her abortion bill to NSW Parliament. Photo: Facebook.

The author of a new bill aimed at improving access to abortion across NSW has dismissed claims it will force all Catholic hospitals in the state to close if passed as “fearmongering”.

Albury-based Greens MP and former GP Dr Amanda Cohn has introduced legislation to NSW Parliament to allow nurse practitioners and endorsed midwives to prescribe medical pregnancy terminations and to require health practitioners with a conscientious objection to abortion to refer a patient to another provider.

Her bill comes following media reports that access to abortion remains severely restricted across NSW some six years after the procedure was decriminalised in the state, particularly in rural areas such as the Riverina.

READ MORE Why is it still so hard to have an abortion in the Riverina?

Anti-abortion activist Dr Joanna Howe claims the Greens’ bill goes too far and will have consequences on the already strained NSW Health system.

“This bill significantly widens ministerial power and has the potential to force the closure of Catholic hospitals who do not want to perform abortion because it ends the life of an innocent human child in-utero,” she wrote in a letter to NSW Premier Chris Minns.

“This will reduce healthcare for everyone as it will place even greater pressure on the hospital system in NSW.

“The bill also greatly erodes freedom of conscience protections for individual health workers. It will force them to actively refer for abortion, which means making them morally complicit in a procedure that they are vehemently opposed to. This will lead to an exodus of Christian and other health workers from a sector that is already experiencing crippling shortages.”

Dr Cohn strongly refuted these assertions, saying her bill will bring NSW in line with other states.

“The bill does not force all hospitals nor all health professionals to provide abortion,” she said.

“There is no intent nor any mechanism for Catholic hospitals to be forced to close. This is deliberate misinformation and fearmongering by anti-abortion activists.

“The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) [medicine regulator] has permitted nurse practitioners and endorsed midwives to prescribe abortion medication up to nine weeks’ gestation since 2023 and this is occurring safely in Queensland and the ACT.

“Allowing them to also prescribe abortion medication in NSW is recommended by NSW Health. Individual doctors, nurses and midwives would still be able to hold a conscientious objection to providing abortion. Practitioners with a conscientious objection are required to refer patients to access abortion in Victorian legislation.”

READ ALSO ‘It’s quite a triggering experience’: Coles’ automatic gates have to go

Dr Cohn says her bill could be debated in NSW Parliament as early as 19 March, but the timing has not been confirmed. She says initial indications from other political parties suggests there is a chance it could pass.

“Health Minister Ryan Park confirmed on Thursday that Labor MPs will have a conscience vote on the bill. Independent MP for Orange Phil Donato has voiced his support for the bill. The Liberal and National parties have not yet determined whether MPs will be allowed a conscience vote on the bill,” she said.

Region asked Calvary Health Care, which runs Catholic hospitals across NSW, if it shared Dr Howe’s concerns about the new abortion bill. It did not answer this question but provided the following statement: “Calvary Health Care does not provide maternity and obstetric services in the public hospitals we operate in NSW.”

Join the conversation

4
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

For many years now, successive Federal Governments, both Labor and Liberal, have forgotten the original human rights commitment Australia made after World War II along with all the other UN member States to provide legislative protection for the child before birth.

According to Article 6 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights:

Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Does “everyone” include “the child before birth”? Absolutely. On November 20, 1959, in the Declaration on the Rights of the Child, the UN General Assembly unanimously agreed that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights “recognized” that the child, by reason of his physical and psychological immaturity, needs special safeguards and care, including legal protection before as well as after birth.

Thus everyone, including the child before birth, has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law—the Universal Declaration gave the child before birth that recognition.

In the Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989), some 190 of the world’s governments, including the Australian government, reaffirmed that they would provide legislative protection for the child “before as well as after birth”.

Australia also agreed to the Declaration on the Rights of the Child:
The child shall enjoy all the rights set forth in this Declaration. Every child, without any exception whatsoever, shall be entitled to these rights, without distinction or discrimination on account of…political or other opinion…birth or other status, whether of himself or of his family.
The most important wording here is the phrase “without any exception whatsoever”. The child before birth is not excepted from the enjoyment of all human rights.

Protection for our unborn children must be restored.

Daily Digest

Want the best Riverina news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riverina stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.