16 September 2025

Wagga MP calls Opposition Leader ‘brumby killer’ as Coalition splits on culling of wild horses

| By Erin Hee
Join the conversation
5
Wes Fang has called NSW Liberal leader Mark Speakman a "brumby killer".

Wes Fang has called NSW Liberal leader Mark Speakman a “brumby killer”. Photo: NSW Parliament.

Wagga-based Nationals MP Wes Fang has branded the leader of his own side of politics a “brumby killer” after learning the Liberal Party will support a new bill aimed at increasing the culling of wild horses in the Snowy Mountains.

Opposition Leader Mark Speakman told a press conference the Liberal Party “will not block” independent MP Dr Joe McGirr’s bill to repeal former deputy premier John Barilaro’s Kosciuszko Wild Horse Heritage Act 2018, which recognised the heritage value of the brumbies and sought to preserve their presence in the Snowy Mountains.

“As environment minister, I saw the extraordinary damage that feral horses do in the Kosciuszko National Park,” Mr Speakman said.

“It is one of the most important natural environments we have in this country, and we have to preserve it. That means the [Barilaro Bill] needs to go.”

The Coalition was united in supporting Mr Barilaro’s bill in 2018, but seven years later the Liberals want to repeal it while the Nationals are expected to hold the line. NSW Labor will support Dr McGirr’s bill, meaning it will pass with the support of the Liberals.

“The Liberal Party is trying to save seats that are under attack from the Greens [and] have lurched to the left and continue to betray the ideals that they supported previously,” Mr Fang said.

“To be honest, they look more like Greens policies than what policies were previously supported by them [Liberals].”

During a recent parliamentary debate on the topic, Mr Fang called Mr Speakman a “brumby killer”, a remark from which he did not back down.

“[Mr Speakman] has decided to support the repeal of the Wild Horse Heritage Bill, which will effectively allow the government to cull all the existing brumbies in the Kosciuszko National Park,” Mr Fang told Region.

READ ALSO Ley’s Liberals want to write off a disastrous week, you think?

Scientists have highlighted the damage that feral horses can cause to the environment and wildlife, but Mr Fang believes there isn’t an “environmental cost” as long as the brumby population is contained to around 3000.

“We support the removal of feral animals, however the brumbies have a heritage and cultural value to Australia,” Mr Fang said.

“We support the science that has proven we can do both matters: retaining the brumbies and supporting the environment.”

Jack Gough, CEO of environmental group Invasive Species Council, disagrees.

“Wes Fang is out on his own. There’s no one else I can talk to in the National Party who thinks this is a good idea,” he said.

“No one likes to see animals killed.

“But the sad reality is that we have a choice to make: either we remove the thousands of feral horses trashing and trampling the alpine areas, or, as the Threatened Species Scientific Community said, horses could be the final nail in the coffin for up to a dozen of our native species.

“Remember, this is not a horse paddock. This is a national park. We’ve set it aside because of its natural values, and there’s almost no one left who thinks that we need to keep feral horses anymore.”

READ ALSO Brumbies prove our hearts are poor guides when it comes to pest control

When asked if this split meant anything for the Coalition, Mr Fang said it was “really a question for the Liberal Party to answer to the voters about why they continue to change their policies and adopt more Greens policies”.

Mr Speakman declined to comment on Mr Fang calling him a “brumby killer”, with his office saying it was a matter for NSW National leader Dugald Saunders.

Region asked Mr Saunders’ office if the Nationals leader thought Mr Fang’s comment was acceptable, but he also declined to comment.

Dr McGirr’s office said he was hopeful the bill would be debated and voted on this week, but the parliamentary schedule was decided by the NSW Labor Government.

Free, trusted, local news, direct to your inbox

Keep up-to-date with what's happening around the Riverina by signing up for our free daily newsletter, delivered direct to your inbox.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

5
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Mr. Hutchinson’s comment is particularly misleading in that it assumes it took 4-5 bullets to kill horses. A policy of multiple shots for each animal was adopted so there could be complete certainty the animal died quickly and humanely. The .308 rifles used are capable of firing multiple rounds in quick succession and have large capacity magazines. Freshly shot horses were inpsected and there was no evidence any animal suffered. The multiple shot policy was introduced to appease those who complain shooting horses is not humane but obviously it is not enough. Each horse is shot multiple times after it goes down and before moving onto the next target.
We are talking about an animal that is domestically abundant that has no right being in a National Park. They have no more heritage value than deer or pigs which have been culled this way for years. It was all contrived by people who believe horses are some magical animal.

Anton Hutchinson6:44 pm 18 Sep 25

After the last brumby slaughter we all learned that most horses had 4-5 gun shot wounds before they died. This is inhumane and disgraceful but anyone could have told the government that trying to shoot horses from helicopters is ridiculous and cruel,.

Fishpoint Johnno4:24 pm 18 Sep 25

Michael McCormack, Wes Fang! I am really pleased that we have journalists like the ABC and Region who highlight lunacy and share well researched realiable factual information to put against ‘popular’ opinions based on ???.

Ronald Spencer4:06 pm 18 Sep 25

The horses should be totally removed as they are an ecological disaster as like most hoved animals they walk the same track to water every day making massive damage by erosion

If the coaltion was to follow Fang’s direction it would be in opposition for the foreseable future. Conservatives need to accept some basic facts about the environment and especially National Parks. It is good to see the Libs doing that now. We no longer mine, cut timber or run cattle and sheep in National Parks. Should we return to that? If the Nats had their way I am sure it would be on the cards but fortunately they will never govern in their own right. Unfortunately we still have destruction as a result of the white elephant call Snowy 2 but that is not the issue here. There is something positive that can be done to benefit this park. The so called heritage value of these horses is a human construct of recent times and Barillarlo thought the legislation would help him get re-elected. His Bill was supported at the time because of some misguided loyalty the Libs had. Now the Libs see a need to touch base with conservative voters like myself who also care about the environment.

Daily Digest

Want the best Riverina news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riverina stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.